Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:36:29 -0400
From:      "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>, Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: GPC 2006 (Pascal) -- deprecated or "expired"??
Message-ID:  <4DEAEBAD.2040107@aldan.algebra.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DEAB13F.5060809@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <BANLkTimmQ7UYubpe0R9NYCVDqXhApcSdGA@mail.gmail.com>	<20110603001251.GA66356@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>	<BANLkTi=Qn6j4eVTxTcG0PdN1RjjvdEuQSQ@mail.gmail.com>	<20110603065653.GB65291@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>	<BANLkTik_XeSpOY-RTeng-t%2BJpQA9=-jBQQ@mail.gmail.com>	<4DE8D764.20607@gmx.de> <4DEA8A0E.5070108@aldan.algebra.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106041541520.34154@wonkity.com> <4DEAB13F.5060809@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04.06.2011 18:27, Doug Barton wrote:
> The math on this is simple, there are maintainers willing to do the 
> work, or not.
It does not matter, whether there are any such maintainers, /if there is 
no work to do/. Neither lang/gpc nor databases/db2 (for one more 
example) required a maintainer at all, when they got "pre-emptively" 
killed...
> Rehashing the arguments about how nice it would be to keep every port 
> in the universe isn't going to get us anywhere. 
Every port in the universe (interestingly, all of them happened to be in 
the Solar system), /that continues to build through changes in the base 
OS/. That's quite achievable -- in fact, we had just that until fairly 
recently...

    -mi




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DEAEBAD.2040107>