Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:50:16 -0400 From: Adam K Kirchhoff <akirchhoff135014@comcast.net> To: Allen <Unix.Hacker@comcast.net> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Graphic card that works? Message-ID: <20110630205016.416f4bfe@sorrow.ashke.com> In-Reply-To: <4E0D1227.3090702@comcast.net> References: <20110623221305.43b74d53@davenulle.org> <4E0AEA54.1080806@bally-wulff.de> <4E0C016E.1040909@comcast.net> <201106300523.41240.akirchhoff135014@gmail.com> <BANLkTi=HoAoEeNx8BBR9EEdDSEXjnSaH4Q@mail.gmail.com> <4E0C5142.2020903@comcast.net> <20110630132455.13304880@mr12941> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106300727040.33308@wonkity.com> <BANLkTikpsZW-vkLESO9KHXp1TcFbmWHGMw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimvcdM7HN9pDXBE_ps0BRep_ALqVw@mail.gmail.com> <4E0CBBBD.9090704@comcast.net> <BANLkTikFFxrpMrSd9Apir=22SrxiA-=XTA@mail.gmail.com> <4E0D1227.3090702@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:17:43 -0400 Allen <Unix.Hacker@comcast.net> wrote: > I can't imagine why someone would put that much effort into ignoring > page upon page of your post only to respond to the last part of it. > Totally ignoring that you basically wrote a 4 page HOWTO for Graphics > cards. There was nothing much worth responding to. In terms of ATI/AMD hardware, there were no facts in Michal's e-mail, just rhetoric. How can anyone respond to that without stooping to the same level? Perhaps I could have responded with facts about AMD hardware on FreeBSD with the open source drivers, but I already posted that information two days ago. Personally, I can't imagine why some folks would spend so much time defending nvidia when someone else makes the simple claim that the nvidia driver just doesn't work for them. Ahhh, maybe I just need to unsubscribe from this list and let misinformation run rampant. Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110630205016.416f4bfe>