Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:27:33 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Default inode number too low in FFS nowadays? Message-ID: <4EB78865.8080106@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EB78803.7060102@FreeBSD.org> References: <B888842A-7DB4-491B-93E3-A376745019F5@sarenet.es> <j8u2af$chv$1@dough.gmane.org> <5C156A63-D86D-4C1B-AFC4-DC5EA09494F6@xerq.net> <4EB3C63F.2060805@quip.cz> <20111104141626.GA28925@freebsd.org> <4EB7126C.3030809@FreeBSD.org> <4EB78803.7060102@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/06/2011 23:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/11/2011 01:04 Doug Barton said the following:
>> Of course, the best solution by far is to set WRKDIRPREFIX to a path
>> with adequate space, preferably something other than /usr/obj.
>
> Why is that? Just because portmaster tries to do some magic under
> ${WRKDIRPREFIX} as opposed to ${WRKDIRPREFIX}/${PORTSDIR:-/usr/ports} ? :-)
Partly, yes. Mostly because mixing src stuff and ports stuff is a bad idea.
--
"We could put the whole Internet into a book."
"Too practical."
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EB78865.8080106>