Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:22:04 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: "Mikhail T." <mi@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: eivind@dimaga.com, cm@linktel.net, archie@whistle.com, brian@awfulhak.org, suutari@iki.fi, net@freebsd.org, Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> Subject: Re: natd slow, eats up an entire CPU... Message-ID: <20111128172204.GA28718@rdtc.ru> In-Reply-To: <4ED3C114.3070200@aldan.algebra.com> References: <201111272043.pARKh9rZ047643@narawntapu.narawntapu> <20111128052758.GA23803@rdtc.ru> <4ED3C114.3070200@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:12:52PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > >Do not use natd, use ipfw nat instead - it uses the same libalias > >but completely in kernel and avoids gigantic natd overhead. > I guess, I'll have to research this new method... But I don't recall this > being a problem with FreeBSD-7.x -- are there some known regressions in > natd from 8.x? I do not know since there is no reason in using natd with 8.2-STABLE where it supports nearly all natd's features including multiple NAT instances and shared translation tables. Eugene Grosbein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111128172204.GA28718>