Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:40:31 +0100 From: Olivier Duchateau <duchateau.olivier@gmail.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils Makefile Message-ID: <CAHcdu2obVN38-8g1h-t687OLiH-GCDye6JEEgMQ7J78JaG4F3Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EE675FF.1090109@FreeBSD.org> References: <201112111256.pBBCuIpY042748@repoman.freebsd.org> <4EE670E4.9040506@FreeBSD.org> <4EE67461.5000004@freebsd.org> <4EE675FF.1090109@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
2011/12/12 Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>: > On 12/12/2011 13:38, Rene Ladan wrote: >> On 12-12-2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: >>> Not only is this not necessary if you run xscreensaver already, it's >>> probably a bad idea. At minimum, can you make this optional? >>> >> [cvs-lists omitted] >> >> I could make it optional if you insist, but if you do a fresh install >> with xfce4-utils but without xlockmore you'll notice the dangling >> invocation. I don't see that xlockmore and xscreensaver conflict, so >> why would it be a Bad Idea(TM) ? > > If we are going to install something by default, it should probably be > xscreensaver. And yes, I'm biased because I maintain that port, but the > client-server model of xscreensaver make it a better choice if actually > keeping the screen locked is part of the goal. :) I agree with you. In xinitrc file (line 185 up to 221) there're two screensavers: - xscreensaver - gnome-screensaver If you add xlockmore, you should add also "an entry" in xinitrc file (I think). > > Given that the thing has existed to date just fine with no dependency to > fulfill the "dangling invocation" can I suggest adding xscreensaver as > an optional dependency, or if people feel strongly about offering > xlockmore to offer them both, with the requisite logic to prevent > installing both? Bonus points if we can detect that one of them is > already installed. :) > > > Doug > >>> On 12/11/2011 04:56, Rene Ladan wrote: >>>> rene 2011-12-11 12:56:18 UTC >>>> >>>> FreeBSD ports repository >>>> >>>> Modified files: >>>> sysutils/xfce4-utils Makefile >>>> Log: >>>> - Add a runtime dependency on x11/xlockmore so that xflock4 can invoke xlock. >>>> - Bump PORTREVISION >>>> >>>> Feature safe: yes >>>> >>>> Revision Changes Path >>>> 1.58 +3 -0 ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils/Makefile >>>> >>>> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.57&r2=1.58&f=h >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xfce >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xfce-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > -- > > [^L] > > Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. > Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xfce > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xfce-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- olivierhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHcdu2obVN38-8g1h-t687OLiH-GCDye6JEEgMQ7J78JaG4F3Q>