Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:25:54 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Alexander Churanov <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: boost 1.48.0 Message-ID: <20120123212554.GF72126@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <4F1DCF90.9040702@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F188891.1050204@FreeBSD.org> <20120119224423.GL4729@azathoth.lan> <4F1918B1.6000603@FreeBSD.org> <20120123171803.GC72126@azathoth.lan> <4F1DCF90.9040702@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:22:24PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 23/01/2012 19:18 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > > I have written this myself: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/boost-1.48.diff > > and I need testers for it. > > Baptiste, > > it seems that along with some removed patches the boost build lost the ability > to use alternative CXX, the variable is not honored. Now boost-libs seems to > always use g++. > > > P.S. Maybe we could/should use the standard "boost build" way of specifying a > build configuration instead of patching the code... Just a thought... > http://www.boost.org/boost-build2/doc/html/bbv2/overview/configuration.html > I agree this was a fast patching to be able to use it for libreoffice, we should for have a closer look at it. regards, Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk8d0GIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExzugCeMD4bf98z3lubeWeqSuCgLzvz /d8AoK+FiIZHv4rSv/xysZ3mWwjnSJxS =88wY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120123212554.GF72126>