Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:35:43 +0200
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r230545 - head/sys/boot/forth
Message-ID:  <4F2075AF.2030900@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F206B8B.30207@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201201251836.q0PIa1sl037892@svn.freebsd.org> <4F205673.30907@FreeBSD.org> <4F206B8B.30207@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 25/01/2012 22:52 Doug Barton said the following:
> On 01/25/2012 11:22, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> I have this crazy idea that we should remove the 'Safe Boot' and "ACPI' options
>> from the default boot menu (on platforms where they are present).
> 
> IMO better labels on the menu would be a better option here. The ACPI
> option in particular is important for some users who have broken ACPI.

Well, from my experience, nowadays it's a 99% chance that a PC simply won't work
at all without ACPI.  However broken it might be.
Not sure if better labels can be of any help with that :-)

>> Besides, 'Safe Boot' seems to be already somewhat undermined by rc.d/kld.
> 
> If there is a way to signal that down to userspace I'm happy to modify
> the behavior of the script.

Maybe this gets propagated via kenv.
In this case changing a label to something like "Enable loading of configured
kernel modules" could be an improvement.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F2075AF.2030900>