Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:54:41 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: erdgeist@erdgeist.org Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Proposal ipv6_addrs_common Message-ID: <20120208.005441.344732308200260953.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4F31406D.5020304@erdgeist.org> References: <20120207.170255.161251905285915806.hrs@allbsd.org> <20120207.232417.487789017555472392.hrs@allbsd.org> <4F31406D.5020304@erdgeist.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Wed_Feb__8_00_54_41_2012_006)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dirk Engling <erdgeist@erdgeist.org> wrote in <4F31406D.5020304@erdgeist.org>: er> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- er> Hash: SHA1 er> er> On 07.02.12 15:24, Hiroki Sato wrote: er> er> > Comments are welcome. I am moving onto implementing address range er> > expansion to this framework. er> er> Before looking deeper into your patch I'd suggest that we also er> consollidate the handler for ipv4_addrs_IF into ifalias_af_common and er> deprecate it. Makes sense? Yes, after integrating address range expansion it is possible and it should be. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Feb__8_00_54_41_2012_006)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk8xSUEACgkQTyzT2CeTzy2M6gCghFxjU/2sJMzJVjPJB6R11qKN xVoAoIf06+VHUOVjWHYtTsoMAW7RAbPK =ed55 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Feb__8_00_54_41_2012_006)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120208.005441.344732308200260953.hrs>