Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:30:09 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages Message-ID: <20120321173009.GI9629@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <4F69F12F.2010300@gmail.com> References: <20120319213508.GA1692@azathoth.lan> <20120320091935.GF1692@azathoth.lan> <20120320102008.GH2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <E05DC188-FDB3-4FA3-8931-4E6B335C07C9@cran.org.uk> <20120321143403.Horde.VhlEOJjmRSRPadjLnx7Eh8A@webmail.leidinger.net> <20120321135919.GG9629@azathoth.lan> <4F69F12F.2010300@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 05:18:07PM +0200, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > when a package can be installed in both i386 and amd64 > > > > and maybe in the Makefile: > > > > PKGARCH= i386 amd64 > > > > or > > > > PKGARCH= x86:32 x86:64 > > Baptiste, if ABI/arch ids will leak out to port Makefiles (i.e. I will > need to care about them), then please leave them matching to the usual > FreeBSD arch names, i.e. i386 and amd64, not the new ones. For reasons > of consistency. The is the reason of the "or" :) the problem will occurs with the old way when arm and mips package support will be generalized regards, Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9qECEACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez9dgCZAYhSIfZv3DYRiku08r7Ghr3w /1oAn1I9SnYgiKhpRbIv7/JVD8hVOYty =Akaq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120321173009.GI9629>