Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:21:20 -0700
From:      Douglas Thrift <douglaswth@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-python@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports/167178: Update port: security/py-keyring Upgrade to version 0.9
Message-ID:  <4F934F00.7030208@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F932CE5.4090108@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201204212150.q3LLoBCn084811@freefall.freebsd.org> <4F932CE5.4090108@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/21/2012 2:55 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/21/12 5:50 PM, Douglas Thrift wrote:
>>   Huh? Don't know why it decided I wasn't the maintainer and then emailed
>>   me since I was the maintainer.
> don't worry.  maintainer isn't the same field as 'Responsible'
> Responsible is someone with GNATS access, or the default group until one
> of the committers decides to adopt the pr and work with you (the
> maintainer)
> 
> a normal pr will be set for 'Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs' (and then
> all the committers can adopt it),  if it is set for 'x11/perl/python',
> then usually only a limited number will look at it.
> 
> you still need to approve any patch.
> 

Hello Michael,

I am well aware of how PRs are supposed to work.

I was talking about "Fix category (submitter is not maintainer) (via the
GNATS Auto Assign
Tool)" and the email sent to me asking to approve (because I am actually
the maintainer) although I sent the PR in the first place.
-- 
Douglas William Thrift
<douglaswth@gmail.com>
<http://douglasthrift.net/>;



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F934F00.7030208>