Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 01:11:08 +0200 From: "coder.tuxfamily" <coder@tuxfamily.org> To: Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> Cc: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gdal 1.9.1 (Was Re: graphics/gdal 1.9.0 does not build on CURRENT) Message-ID: <4FC1630C.7070808@tuxfamily.org> In-Reply-To: <4FC107D7.5060905@gwdg.de> References: <4FBA9620.3020207@gwdg.de> <4FBA997C.6010000@tuxfamily.org> <4FBAA203.90201@gwdg.de> <4FBAA388.1070906@tuxfamily.org> <4FBB24D3.4010209@gwdg.de> <4FBBC3F2.4050104@tuxfamily.org> <4FBBC504.5010305@gwdg.de> <4FBBD7B4.5090505@tuxfamily.org> <4FBBFADA.6010700@gwdg.de> <4FBD0797.9040803@gwdg.de> <4FBD0EE2.9050703@tuxfamily.org> <4FBD122E.9030606@gwdg.de> <4FBF4303.8020501@gwdg.de> <4FBFE2B8.5000601@tuxfamily.org> <4FBFF060.9070706@gwdg.de> <4FC0FB76.2070702@tuxfamily.org> <4FC107D7.5060905@gwdg.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 26.05.2012 18:41, Rainer Hurling a écrit :
> On 26.05.2012 17:49 (UTC+2), coder.tuxfamily wrote:
>> Le 25.05.2012 22:49, Rainer Hurling a écrit :
>>> On 25.05.2012 21:51 (UTC+1), coder.tuxfamily wrote:
>>>> Can you try to build the "new" port of gdal ?
>>>>
>>>> I have the same problem with swig for php...
>>>
>>> Thanks for the update. It builds and installs fine here on two boxes
>>> with 10.0-CURRENT (amd64).
>>>
>>> One issue which should be thought about before updating gdal in the
>>> ports:
>>>
>>> Does gdal-1.9.1 really needs swig 2.0? It seems so for at least libkml?
>>>
>>> The problem is, that in your Makefile swig 2.0 conflicts with an
>>> installed swig 1.3.40, which is needed for example by graphics/geos,
>>> graphics/graphviz, math/saga, science/py-scipy and some others.
>>>
>>> Affected ports can be found for example with
>>> find /usr/ports -name Makefile -depth 3 -exec grep -l -e "swig13" {} \;
>>>
>>> I personally would prefer the newer swig 2.0 version (even for most
>>> other ports). Do you think it is necessary to forbid a parallel swig
>>> 1.3.40 installation in your port? I read somewhere that both swig ports
>>> can coexist in principle, only some docs share the same places (which
>>> should be changed, of course).
>>>
>>
>> Maybe you're right. I've see on trac.osgeo.org that it uses swig-1.3.40.
>> I will try without specify version of swig.
>
> I saw in the news on http://www.swig.org/, that swig 2.0.6 is out with
> many bug fixes and enhancements for templates and target languages like
> php and python. Perhaps swig 2.0.6 is ready now for gdal?
>
> I just checked, that swig 1.3.40 and 2.0.4 should be able to coexist at
> the same time. At least they do not share any filenames.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Ruby option seems have also a problem with SWIG.
PGSQL conflict with ssl.
I need to add condition between podofo and poppler.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC1630C.7070808>