Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:04:15 -0400 From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Jan Henrik Sylvester <me@janh.de> Cc: hackers-list freebsd <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: TeXLive merge into FreeBSD ports tree - FreeBSD project idea Message-ID: <20120617200415.GA11652@zim.MIT.EDU> In-Reply-To: <4FDE2EE9.5020602@janh.de> References: <CACsYpVMrR1aDDM5k9t8c%2BLRdnEL5yR761L7D6er0gM=1F9i4ww@mail.gmail.com> <20120530204502.5cab974c@desktop.pc> <20120617060135.GA7986@zim.MIT.EDU> <4FDDC73A.3090203@janh.de> <20120617163218.GA10776@zim.MIT.EDU> <4FDE2EE9.5020602@janh.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > Even with a knob instead of checking if print/texlive-core is installed, > it would put a lot of mess into the ports tree. Some maintainers will > not agree to introduce these conditions, if there is no general > agreement that we want to transition to TeXLive that way. > > As far as I remember, both romain@ and hrs@ have stated that they do not > want both teTeX and TeXLive in the tree concurrently. In that case, it sounds like using TeXLive in FreeBSD will be a bit tricky until someone steps in and does all the work required for integration. Unfortunately I'm a bit time-constrained for the next few months, but I do use TeXLive and would be happy to test any proposed patches.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120617200415.GA11652>