Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:15:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Marco Antonio Muskus Muskus <mamuskus@edatel.com.co> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211915080.4170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <4FE34DEC.9070908@edatel.com.co> References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> <CAPj0R5Kmi-%2BdJ7mPvTrTAoS8O983svOyR2WyK2_v1Cr07dSS_A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211413140.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhuQ%2BbxKW9%2BdX%2BzS9mErwz8JSkV2G7qL0KfB8BH_LGJAgA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211539230.2903@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhvR_eKtVxdKcaMyOS7tLw_AOHKgUy3o7mJn2b=chMA0Xw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211619250.3092@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhvwKZm7heoe7tpfhYCJvkknw_HC7aFjCu%2B-1xYQBmV6ng@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211644350.3170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhsyOh34SghWzQPpnTig%2BUmSEO2VP7jfPxTXs9zW9Uakeg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211707570.3361@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <AA485AA5-F3F8-4D02-8F59-05AC76172C40@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211804540.3631@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <9672338A-45DA-4680-977B-253CEF3201C8@gmail.com> <4FE34DEC.9070908@edatel.com.co>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> ZFS is superior to UFS. End of the history. > > There is no point in use old technology (UFS) when the new one can make the > same as the older and better ? anyway there must be morons here like me that after observation conclude that older is far safer and better. But if you want "end of history" then fine.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211915080.4170>