Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:26:24 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Cc: Alexander@leidinger.net, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au Subject: Re: libcups dependencies and linux apps printing Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnEnyzLnTCU4Z5tVJJuGrkhL4FFnnv95RzfQDSBE9JJFg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4f11af12.laG1ZsKm3Q69c5qZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4F0F9174.9000208@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120113224506.0000765f@unknown> <4f11af12.laG1ZsKm3Q69c5qZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:36 AM, <perryh@pluto.rain.com> wrote: > Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote: > >> For critical dependencies (ports which are depended upon by >> several ports) it is better when a group of people maintain >> them (more people are always welcome ;-) ). > > and yet, having a port maintained by ports@ -- which is quite > a large group -- tends _not_ to be considered a good thing :) A maintainer of "ports@freebsd.org" is an exception. It correctly means that there is NO maintainer, not that the entire mailing list maintains it. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnEnyzLnTCU4Z5tVJJuGrkhL4FFnnv95RzfQDSBE9JJFg>