Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 04:38:01 -0400 From: parv <parv_@yahoo.com> To: "Derek C." <coffee@blarg.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: APM bug? Message-ID: <20010724043801.A42208@moo.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010724005624.00af4aa8@mail.blarg.net>; from coffee@blarg.net on Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:57:47AM -0700 References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010724003748.00b1dd20@mail.blarg.net> <5.1.0.14.0.20010724005624.00af4aa8@mail.blarg.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
on Jul 24 04:08, i got this from Derek... > Whoops, my bad, it only breaks if I change it to enable... > > I donno if it's supposed to break on that (the site I found said to do > exactly that, change disable to enable). > > Derek > > At 12:41 AM 7/24/2001, Derek C. wrote: > >Line 132 of -stable under src/i386/config/generic which reads: > >device apm0 at nexus? disable flags 0x20 # Advanced Power Management > >causes a kernel build to fail 100% of the time on my system, reporting a > >syntax error. Is it just me, or does this break for everyone else as well? how about, just... device apm0 at nexus? flags 0x20 # Advanced Power Management ...take out 'disable' to enable (implicit enable) -- so, do you like word games or scrabble? - parv To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010724043801.A42208>