Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:58:10 +0400 From: Andrey Zonov <zont@FreeBSD.org> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there any modern alternative to pstack? Message-ID: <50F45542.3070206@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50206296.4060802@rawbw.com> References: <4F775DF5.1020704@rawbw.com> <4F8A8CD2.5020103@rawbw.com> <20120415093029.GR2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <201204160959.29089.jhb@freebsd.org> <50206296.4060802@rawbw.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 8/7/12 4:34 AM, Yuri wrote: > On 04/16/2012 06:59, John Baldwin wrote: >> I'm fine with putting it into the base. If so, we should import 1.2 >> first I >> think and then apply the 1.3 patch. > > So are there plans to import it into the base? Maybe for 9.1? > /usr/ports/sysutils/pstack is still i386 only. > Try this version [1]. I plan to update sysutils/pstack to it. [1] https://github.com/z0nt/pstack -- Andrey Zonov [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ9FVFAAoJEBWLemxX/CvTUm8H/3iY10xJ5eUYaOQiftibxRTp clXNXPV8rFBPywBqyKRu7AUh7gXc8H1SpGHfngUIc8f1ozkk/uJynIfmr/vTLe0k zhyqLIFkAPFm61FeMOR89RXrOEWPzVqsiGHQ8qXGlz6IOPowQ4DFAEwpp4B2+89e J/7tPdjhwwUe0fckkarBzA/UbytMwhMhVzrXqqGEu6RR7HyxeZOSerYRrO3mb6y0 QjdD/WZyWPWLw40LqqGIYYjsO4Ocbzcpi5C9LoKnBcQwHVGUtwnvP9XQnx/3LoYQ wxeV15F9GhF4uKHHToNFTRNW20K4p8T4HgjWuO/XJTbBAkVvIJnlDgb9Qz7yMGY= =kprN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50F45542.3070206>