Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:05:35 -0600 From: "Samuel J. Greear" <sjg@evilcode.net> To: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound Message-ID: <CANY-Wm_YrJ2k4JCHK4oJ4wHS_h6g5JasrSD35hqYQwb6e2rGzg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5033D9D7.808@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAL409Kzjjaur5%2B1gGh7VtTdg5M1zjLpZ-kmm8%2BrWv%2Bw9ua%2B14A@mail.gmail.com> <5031FAAB.9020409@FreeBSD.org> <86a9xobo2c.fsf@ds4.des.no> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208211705380.78446@ai.fobar.qr> <5033C7BB.1040702@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208211751580.78446@ai.fobar.qr> <5033D9D7.808@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 8/21/2012 11:08 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote: > >>> Neither importing ldns nor removing BIND is going to have any effect on >>> the stub resolver library in libc. >> >> Yes it does as if we are not carefull, we'll neither have a _proper_ >> validating caching resolver but 4 different resolver libraries 3 of >> which needing crypto and only 2 with a well known support plan and >> only 2 with the same interface in base. > <snip> Just a data point. DragonFly removed BIND from base in favor of ldns/drill in June of 2010, there has not been any quantifiable fallout. We did not bring in unbound and there are no plans to do so. Sam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANY-Wm_YrJ2k4JCHK4oJ4wHS_h6g5JasrSD35hqYQwb6e2rGzg>