Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:54:26 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> To: Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Message-ID: <50D3B342.4070108@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50D3A58A.3020002@ose.nl> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> <CAJHU=or2MJ7cNz2p4v%2BYFcOjgV-2dXrxngTeUCkxU8kOqOoFaQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1vQPf8NUiq9fqr-qPDYSjON%2BMhXuQd6bHbQWtCbJ%2Byyqw@mail.gmail.com> <50C8CF77.2040102@FreeBSD.org> <kab3a0$3jk$1@ger.gmane.org> <50C975B3.7070701@FreeBSD.org> <CACdU%2Bf-BrtCZhDT25yX0pvcFx9OvgyndQSQKXS-7UPYGyvr9VA@mail.gmail.com> <50C991F3.3040307@freebsd.org> <50D3A1E3.6090408@FreeBSD.org> <50D3A58A.3020002@ose.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig754EB22CA57F07303252969B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 20/12/2012 23:55, Bas Smeelen wrote: > On 12/21/12 00:40, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 13/12/2012 08:29, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> >> (On 'pkg check -Ba' producing 'shared library not found' errors for so= me >> packages) >> >>> Unfortunately it seems to be a fairly common effect in some large >>> projects. Other packages showing the same symptoms: >>> >>> thunderbird (yeah -- that one was predictable...) >>> openjdk6 >>> virtualbox-ose >>> >>> ... and that's just out of what's installed on my desktop: by no mean= s >>> comprehensive. As far as I can tell from a quick check, openjdk6 >>> doesn't rely on setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the environment. >>> >>> I've raised issue #403 in pkgng Github. >> I've just finished committing fixes for this problem to the master and= >> release-1.0 branches in Github. If anyone is feeling enthusiastic and= >> would like to try pulling those sources and confirming that their >> favourite packages no longer generate scads of nasty errors when >> re-analysing shlib dependencies, I'd be grateful. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> >> PS. If you're running pkg-1.0.3, I recommend you pull down the >> release-1.0 branch for these tests. While you could upgrade to 1.1.a1= >> from master, that involves various local.sqlite DB schema changes whic= h >> will be tedious to unwind should you want to revert to the released >> version. >> >=20 > I would like to. > But just getting used to svn and other new things since simple csup and= > friends. > How do I pull it? > I have pkg-1.0.3_1 on a machine building packages for my laptop right n= ow. Install git, and then something like: git clone https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng.git cd pkgng git checkout release-1.0 make then you can run pkg-static from the pkg-static directory, or you can 'make install', and run pkg as usual. There will be a pkg-1.0.4 release fairly soon though. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig754EB22CA57F07303252969B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDTs0sACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyrggCfTNX8TOVa5tkUWV50yvqPPpFO bDcAnipeArb+9Tgp7bzKB3TjIAmBCIQV =PabA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig754EB22CA57F07303252969B--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50D3B342.4070108>