Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 02:24:00 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Rene Ladan <r.c.ladan@student.tue.nl> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 and -O2 option Message-ID: <62179647@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <51471998@srv.sem.ipt.ru> (Boris Samorodov's message of "Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:41:37 %2B0400") References: <55023220@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20050828150947.GA58038@82-168-75-155-bbxl.xdsl.tiscali.nl> <51471998@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:41:37 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 17:09:47 +0200 Rene Ladan wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 04:30:19PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > > > > As for 5.x notes about -O2 (libalias, gcc) were removed at revision > > > 1.229.2.7 of /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.conf. But for 6.0-BETA3 > > > we do have these warnings. Should they be removed as for 5.x? Is it > > > safe to use -O2 to build/install kernel, world, ports fro 6.0? > > > > > Kernel and world seem to be ok with -O2, for ports it is not advised. > Well, as nobody complained so far, should I file a PR to remove notes > about -O2 to examples/etc/make.conf for 6.0-BETA3? OK. Here it is: ----- http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=85548 >Category: conf >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >Synopsis: share/examples/etc/make.conf: delete -O2 warnings for 6.0-BETA3 >Arrival-Date: Wed Aug 31 22:10:30 GMT 2005 ----- Who will take the resposibility? Oh, not all of you, guys... ;-) WBR -- bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62179647>