Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:04:23 -0400 From: George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com> To: george@ceetonetechnology.com Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: "Crochet" build tool Message-ID: <1CBF1416-3237-4DCE-8D61-7E998265C887@neville-neil.com> In-Reply-To: <5151B454.9090402@ceetonetechnology.com> References: <CFBA557F-3DB9-40BA-B222-8E8C67707C9B@freebsd.org> <5DFA61DB-70E4-4C3D-ACA0-995A175706C8@neville-neil.com> <5151B454.9090402@ceetonetechnology.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:44 , George Rosamond <george@ceetonetechnology.com> wrote: > Integrating into base would be nice. > > My question would be: just for ARM, or as Tim mentions in his script, > potentially for other architectures also? My thought is that it's more about the fact that you're building for embedded and the cross archticture part is tangential, but I also don't want to dump a ton of work on Tim on top of what he's already done. > If so what would be benefit/difference with NanoBSD if Tim's script was > used for other architectures? > > For embedded-type systems on i386, I always built my own and never got > into Nano. I think this is to make it easier for folks who don't normally do this to do this. Those of us, you included, who can build their own one off scripts can do that but the project needs a good way to package this stuff and Tim's script is the best thing to come along in a while. Best, Georgehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1CBF1416-3237-4DCE-8D61-7E998265C887>