Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:38:43 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@ixsystems.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2 Message-ID: <51E398F3.40008@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <51E1061F.3050804@ixsystems.com> References: <51D90B9B.9080209@ixsystems.com> <51D92826.1070707@freebsd.org> <51E1061F.3050804@ixsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13.07.2013 09:47, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Andre, we have a number of people running this patch in the following configurations: > > 6-8GB ram + 10gigE ethernet using iozone over NFS. As you haven't seen any problems yet I've asked RE to green light the MFC. -- Andre > We're rolling it into the PCBSD rolling update as well. I'm thinking it makes sense to roll this > into the 9.2 release to give us more scalability. > > -Alfred > > > On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote: >> On 07.07.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >>> Andre, >>> >>> Are you going to have time to MFC things from -current for auto-tuning -stable before 9.2? >> >> I simply ran out of time on Friday and MFCing such a big change requires >> more testing. >> >>> I fear (maybe unnecessarily?) that we are about to ship yet another release that can't do basic >>> 10gigE when sufficient memory exists. >> >> There was some debate with myself whether such a behavior changing MFC >> would be appropriate for a mid-stream stable release. I guess yes, though >> a number of people who currently set the parameters manually would have >> to remove their tuning settings. >> >>> If you don't have time, then let me know and I'll see what I can do. >> >> Can you help me with with testing? >> > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51E398F3.40008>