Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:22:39 -0300 From: Marcelo Gondim <gondim@bsdinfo.com.br> To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@FreeBSD.org>, Dennis Yusupoff <dyr@smartspb.net>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problem with ipfw table add 0.0.0.0/8 Message-ID: <53BABB3F.2010603@bsdinfo.com.br> In-Reply-To: <5377F2CB.5010406@bsdinfo.com.br> References: <5371084F.1060009@bsdinfo.com.br> <F78BF3AC-F031-4528-A4C1-5B22E88CEC00@dataix.net> <5371112B.2030209@bsdinfo.com.br> <5371E9E7.70400@smartspb.net> <5371F4C8.3080501@FreeBSD.org> <53720AA4.80909@smartspb.net> <537767C5.80205@FreeBSD.org> <5377F0BB.1040501@bsdinfo.com.br> <5377F2CB.5010406@bsdinfo.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all, Already exists MFC available to fix this problem in 10-STABLE? # ipfw table 99 add 0.0.0.0/8 # ipfw table 99 list ::/8 0 Cheers, Gondim Em 17/05/2014 20:37, Marcelo Gondim escreveu: > Em 17/05/14 20:28, Marcelo Gondim escreveu: >> Em 17/05/14 10:44, Alexander V. Chernikov escreveu: >>> On 13.05.2014 16:05, Dennis Yusupoff wrote: >>>> I think that universal table for all kind of data (ipv4, ipv6, ports, >>>> etc) is a bad idea by design. At least unless you haven't any >>>> ability to >>> It is not always "universal" in kernel. >>> Actually, different radix tables are used to store both IPv4 and >>> IPv6 in single table. >>>> specify address family on add, to avoid attempts to guess what user >>>> meant. Something like "ipfw table X add DEEF.DE ipv6". >>> I'm going to add explicit table type/naming setup soon. >>> Idea is the following: >>> >>> 1) Existing table can be named and addressed by either number or name. >>> However, you still need to assign table number manually. >>> >>> 2) Table type/name can be specified explicitly via one of the >>> following commands: >>> * ipfw table 1 create [type <cidr|u32|ifindex|iface>] [name >>> "table_name"] >>> * ipfw table <num|name> name "table_name" >>> * ipfw table "table_name" type <cidr|u32|ifindex|iface> >>> >>> 3) ipfw(8) stops trying to guess appropriate type based on used >>> value. Instead, >>> it requests table type from kernel and interprets value according to >>> returned type. >>> Default type for all tables is cidr >>> >>> 4) Table(s) can be returned to default values using ipfw table >>> <num|all|name> destroy. >>> Destroy means: >>> * flush >>> * table tries (or other structures) freed >>> * type set to cidr >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 13.05.2014 14:32, Alexander V. Chernikov пишет: >>>>> On 13.05.2014 13:46, Dennis Yusupoff wrote: >>>>>> May be this will help? See answer on >>>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/189471 >>>>> I'll try to fix it within a few days. >>> Fixed in r266310. >> The problem still exists. >> >> # ipfw table 99 add 0.0.0.0/8 >> # ipfw table 99 list >> ::/8 0 >> >> # uname -a >> FreeBSD mail.xxxxxx.com.br 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #8 >> r266370: Sat May 17 19:57:23 BRT 2014 >> root@mail.xxxxxx.br:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GONDIM amd64 > Ah! Sorry! > Is still in the head. > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53BABB3F.2010603>