Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:07:13 +0100 From: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fix Emulex "oce" driver in CURRENT Message-ID: <FF410A78-138C-412C-8CC1-40CADF4AF6CD@sarenet.es> In-Reply-To: <5481AC78.6050107@multiplay.co.uk> References: <CAO0mX5aGStHevUa=Hyk4gru5f4mwczW=6%2B9jbJtMYC1i12QF7w@mail.gmail.com> <201406301402.42119.jhb@freebsd.org> <8BA1A243-8EA9-449A-A2D2-4E03487CE3E0@sarenet.es> <5481AC78.6050107@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Steven Hartland wrote: >=20 > On 04/09/2014 09:49, Borja Marcos wrote: >> On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote: >>=20 >>> I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij@) who has = worked with >>> folks at Emulex to maintain this driver. He is probably the best = person to >>> review this. >> Hi, >>=20 >> Seems 10.1 is on the pipeline now, but as far as I know none of these = fixes have been applied to -STABLE. Any chances to do it yet? As far as = I know, the "oce" driver is currently unusable in -STABLE. I managed to = cause a panic reliably within 30 seconds. >=20 > Was there any conclusion to this, current and releng/10.0 & = releng/10.1 seem pretty similar with regards oce but a customer is = reporting panics very similar to this thread. >=20 > Did the commit of the additional locking never make it in? Not as far as I know. I=B4ve updated a couple of machines here to = 10-STABLE and I've been applying the patch manually myself.=20 I don't think it's been applied even to -HEAD.=20 For now I've told my coworkers to avoid Emulex cards whenever possible. = As far as I know the driver is unusable in its present state. Borja.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FF410A78-138C-412C-8CC1-40CADF4AF6CD>