Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 21:51:51 -0400 From: scrat <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does FreeBSD insist on https? Message-ID: <551F43B7.2020905@columbus.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <551F2E2D.6090106@bluerosetech.com> References: <CAA3ZYrAwXOp_5vfUPsEkF82UPaAqNwnTm7dw1ogf-C-X%2Bj730g@mail.gmail.com> <20150403183957.GA1379@WorkBox.Home> <551F24FF.9020101@columbus.rr.com> <551F2E2D.6090106@bluerosetech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/03/15 20:19, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > On 2015-04-03 16:40, scrat wrote: >> On 04/03/15 14:39, Bigby James wrote: >>> On a lark, I went ahead and installed Firefox, Chromium, Dillo, >>> VimB, Luakit, >>> UZBL, surf, SeaMonkey, Conkeror, w3m and lynx. Every one of them is >>> able to >>> access https://www.freebsd.org without any problem, with the >>> exceptions of UZBL >>> and lynx, which each complain about SSL/TLS issues (which can in >>> turn be >>> circumvented in their respective configurations). >> >> NCSA Mosaic? > > Considering NCSA Mosaic wouldn't even work on a modern website, I > think we can safely remove it from the test cases. ;) > But I still have it installed on my RedHat 5.2 ( do you want a copy? ) from many years ago ( middle 1990's ), i386 with several MBs of ram......all 16 of them.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?551F43B7.2020905>