Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:18:06 -0400 From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: nanoBSD boot problem (on USB stick or as a HD) Message-ID: <CAFMmRNymd6jeZLepa1W_2m-5uYC5AO%2B9qyVyzZNnoYJpvibDSg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55F8CBB2.1080109@freebsd.org> References: <CAO0mX5YwFpUhcWfni8QeyOzesFmLpCQnkPT5zFOYU5PokYdiFw@mail.gmail.com> <55F8CBB2.1080109@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: > one possibility is to use gpart label to describe the device. > possibly it woudl hav ehte same result in both cases, but I don't know for > sure that > it works for root device.. you'd have to test. > > I would recommend a UFS label instead. gpart labels are kind of fragile and easy to mess up. My previous employer has been shipping systems where the root fs is specified in fstab via a UFS label for years and it never gave us a problems.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFMmRNymd6jeZLepa1W_2m-5uYC5AO%2B9qyVyzZNnoYJpvibDSg>