Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 21:07:49 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN Message-ID: <20151112180749.GX31314@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <5644D1A2.6010305@freebsd.org> References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <5643B3EB.1040002@FreeBSD.org> <20151112000651.GH48728@zxy.spb.ru> <5644C937.6030103@freebsd.org> <20151112174437.GJ48728@zxy.spb.ru> <5644D1A2.6010305@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:51:30PM -0500, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2015-11-12 12:44, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:15:35PM -0500, Allan Jude wrote: > > > >> On 2015-11-11 19:06, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:32:27PM -0800, Bryan Drewery wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 11/10/2015 1:42 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > >>>>> I would also like to remove the NONE cipher > >>>>> patch, which is also available in the port (off by default, just like in > >>>>> base). > >>>> > >>>> Fun fact, it's been broken in the port for several months with no > >>>> complaints. It was just reported and fixed upstream in the last day and > >>>> I wrote in a similar fix in the port. That speaks a lot about its usage > >>>> in the port currently. > >>> > >>> I am try using NPH/NONE with base ssh and confused: don't see > >>> performance rise, too complex to enable and too complex for use. > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>> > >> > >> I did a few quick (and dirty) benchmarks and it shows that the NONE > >> cipher definitely makes a difference. Version of OpenSSL also seems to > >> make a difference, as one might expect. > >> > >> Note: openssh from ports seems to link against both base and ports > >> libcrypto, I am still trying to make sure this isn't corrupting my > >> benchmark results. > >> > >> I am still debugging my dummynet setup to be able to prove that HPN > >> makes a difference (but it does). > >> > >> https://wiki.freebsd.org/SSHPerf > > > > I see you test NONE only on OpenSSH_7.1p1/1.0.2d. > > I am try OpenSSH_6.6.1p1./1.0.1p (both side) > > I am got about 500Mbit/s. > > For OpenSSH_6.6.1p1/NONE I am got abot same. > > > > I am don't see this combination in you table (OpenSSH_6.6.1p1./1.0.1p ix0 OpenSSH_6.6.1p1./1.0.1p) > > > > If NONE is actually being used, big warnings will be printed to your screen: > > WARNING: ENABLED NONE CIPHER > WARNING: ENABLED NONE CIPHER > > If you don't see this, NONE is not being used. I am see this, of couse.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151112180749.GX31314>