Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:02:18 +0000 From: James Lodge <James@Lodge.me.uk> To: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Bhyve - EPT/Real Address Mode - Unrestricted Guest Message-ID: <VI1PR06MB1037C817EDBF80849C2F366CF9C10@VI1PR06MB1037.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <569D5533.8000000@freebsd.org> References: <VI1PR06MB103704CF6B4F070A60E5C2D5F9C00@VI1PR06MB1037.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>, <569D5533.8000000@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
>Hi James, > Can someone please confirm that having EPT support in the CPU is not > necessarily enough to run Bhyve. I have an Intel Xeon L5520 (Nehalem > family) that supports EPT but when trying to run an VM, receive ... > My understanding is that the L5520 does not have support for > "Unrestricted Guest/Real Address Mode" which was introduce with the > release of the Westmere architecture. > Yes, that's correct. > I assume its a non starter without the unrestricted guest feature. > Mostly. You'll only be able to run single vCPU FreeBSD guests since >they boot directly into 64-bit mode: everything else (including multiple >vCPU guests) requires either 16-bit support or 32-bit non-paged >protected mode, both of which are only available on Intel with the >'unrestricted guest' feature. >later, >Peter. Hi Peter, Thank you for the clarification. It looks like I'll need to purchase a couple to Westmere X5650 CPU's that do have the 'unregistered guest' feature as I need to be able to running multi vcpu FreeBSD vms and Windows. Thank you again for your help. Regards James Lodgehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?VI1PR06MB1037C817EDBF80849C2F366CF9C10>