Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 02:23:58 +0100 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de>, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: possible em regression (was Re: svn commit: r294958 - in stable/10: share/man/man4 sys/dev/e1000 sys/dev/ixgb sys/dev/netmap) Message-ID: <20160130012358.GY15359@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <56ABCE95.3030807@sentex.net> References: <201601272231.u0RMV8LW019394@repo.freebsd.org> <56ABAA92.5050901@sentex.net> <56ABB291.5040305@omnilan.de> <56ABCE95.3030807@sentex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 03:41:57PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > No multi queue. Stock GENERIC kernel with a couple of things removed. > hw.em are just the defaults. I will try without TSO > > % ifconfig em0 > em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 > > options=4209b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWTSO> > Hrm, that's strange, TSO4 should be enabled by default so apparently you are already disabling it; what is the behavior if you turn it on? Do you use a < Gigabit link? Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160130012358.GY15359>