Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:34:40 +0100 From: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS receive and attributes, proposing some changes. was Re: ZFS full system backup hoses the backup host. Message-ID: <3D3D7CC4-5E22-4DD0-B935-9EC6BCECB8C3@sarenet.es> In-Reply-To: <56D040E1.3090000@multiplay.co.uk> References: <CACpH0Me58jK%2BOz3PCqH93NEn=5V1SKwPGdku62sAVLVh%2BWxEeA@mail.gmail.com> <0ae0e3ab-6ad1-4ae2-9ee9-a7d993088a01@email.android.com> <C3EAA8F3-8EFA-450E-A4A3-A790EA2DA396@sarenet.es> <56D040E1.3090000@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 26 Feb 2016, at 13:11, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> = wrote: >=20 > I actually have a patch (see attached) which does this but never got = round to finishing the RTI so its got some rough edges. Sounds great, checking it. :) I=E2=80=99m not that familiar with the ZFS code but this looks like the = Perfect Excuse to do it finally! The -o option is busy actually, that=E2=80=99s why I suggested -O. Borja.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D3D7CC4-5E22-4DD0-B935-9EC6BCECB8C3>