Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 02:26:04 -0700 From: Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> To: Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de> Cc: Stephen Hurd <shurd@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r333338 - in stable/11/sys: dev/bnxt kern net sys Message-ID: <CAK7dMtBkCvLgPVnsf%2BECcrdbKNvOShONeZ=vqvg3dJ5ZeuoP5w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5AF16B8B.7030703@omnilan.de> References: <201805072142.w47LgN1R041002@repo.freebsd.org> <5AF16B8B.7030703@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
iflib in stable/11 only affects bnxt at this time. You should try out HEAD and let us know for the rest of your questions. Regards, Kevin On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:19 AM, Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de> wro= te: > Bez=C3=BCglich Stephen Hurd's Nachricht vom 07.05.2018 23:42 (localtime)= : >> Author: shurd >> Date: Mon May 7 21:42:22 2018 >> New Revision: 333338 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/333338 >> >> Log: >> Merge iflib changes to 11-STABLE >> >> MFC r300147, r300153, r300154, r300215, r301563, r301567, >> r302372, r307560, r307562, r307563, r307568, r308792, r311039, >> r311837, r312755, r312903, r312905, r312924, r313248, r315217, >> r315245, r315288, r316278, r316281, r316502, r316596, r317756, >> r319917, r319921, r319984, r319989, r320059, r320609, r320611, >> r321253, r321629, r321630, r322337, r322338, r322823, r323077, >> r323825, r323876, r323879, r323887, r323941, r323942, r323943, >> r323944, r323954, r324038, r324318, r324937, r325166, r325167, >> r325168, r325201, r325241, r325245, r325487, r325494, r325901, >> r326033, r326369, r326370, r326432, r326577, r326578, r326702, >> r326706, r326775, r327013, r327017, r327052, r327072, r327098, >> r327242, r327244, r327247, r329651, r329742, r330289, r330715, >> r330721, r332419, r332422, r332729 >> >> Reviewed by: sbruno >> Approved by: re (delphij@) >> Sponsored by: Limelight Networks >> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15142 > > Thanks to all for all your hard work pushing iflib. > > Unfortunately I haven't had time to check if EM_MULTIQUEUE suffers from > a regression with iflib =E2=80=93 previous em-attached NICs 2nd queue sup= port. > At least one i217 I'm using -current with, uses only one queue. But that > was igb, not em, so I'm wondering if i217 ist limited to 1 queue =E2=80= =93 at > least i210 supports 4 queues... hints welcome. > > But I have several oldish machines with hartwell (82574L, still running > 10-stable), which showed much better delivery if multiple line speed > clients were generating load and EM_MULTIQUEUE added support for 2 > queues (and ULE on SMP machine...). > > I'm also unsure about the current netmap state. When I last checked > (some months ago), igb(->em)/netmap didn't work. If netmap support was > restored, I missed that. > > Can you confirm that if EM_MULTIQUEUE and netmap are supposed to be > still working with all the adapters which were supported by previous > stable-11 (em+igb) code? > Or do we need bold release notes that igb/em users must be aware of > significant changes? > > Thanks, > > -harry > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAK7dMtBkCvLgPVnsf%2BECcrdbKNvOShONeZ=vqvg3dJ5ZeuoP5w>