Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 02:23:24 -0400 From: David Magda <dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca> To: Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <C141E1AD-DE21-4F9F-B40E-5C72A3453AB5@ee.ryerson.ca> In-Reply-To: <5C21CA77-966F-4012-9D32-9507ABAD6747@digsys.bg> References: <CAOgwaMvsv3e1TxDauV038Pp7LRiYeH7oAODE%2Bw-pxHt9oGrXMA@mail.gmail.com> <20120601121555.GF5335@home.opsec.eu> <4FC8B67D.5090208@digsys.bg> <20120601131236.GJ8591@macbook.bluepipe.net> <20120602010346.GA27660@isuckatdomains.members.linode.com> <4D744565-4073-485E-B769-82BE1F7E2C0A@ee.ryerson.ca> <20120602032529.GE1377@glenbarber.us> <CAOjFWZ7rq_NaAdaKL6Woi-ATy390ax20KWO=V_Jpf9-vJWwgLg@mail.gmail.com> <5C21CA77-966F-4012-9D32-9507ABAD6747@digsys.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 2, 2012, at 00:51, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > On 02.06.2012, at 07:19, Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> Glustre sits above the storage system, replicating data between = systems. >> So, disks -- ZFS (via Zvols) -- Glustre. >>=20 >=20 > How is this different than ZFS using remote zvols via iSCSI? Can it = tolerate down nodes better than ZFS? Gluster ~ NFS++.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C141E1AD-DE21-4F9F-B40E-5C72A3453AB5>