Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 02:37:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ifconfig_bxe0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv" seems to break bridging Message-ID: <480757q4-5s17-r7qq-95n6-548qpqrr305q@yvfgf.mnoonqbm.arg> In-Reply-To: <6c28ac48ebdfca06e91347e6b514e2d5@bsdforge.com> References: <aIIuGOc9-hdvUyFU@int21h> <aIIwQq2GQyiAoaTp@freefall.freebsd.org> <756d400d-fa0f-45ea-ba24-235234ee41ff@app.fastmail.com> <868qkd9wkf.fsf@ltc.des.dev> <aIKVMTT5-VL-YkXW@freefall.freebsd.org> <21cec060-6e1b-4ab3-b0ad-b67c5a7fc288@quip.cz> <aIKrEXlzq2G_tVVH@int21h> <6c28ac48ebdfca06e91347e6b514e2d5@bsdforge.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025, Chris wrote: > On 2025-07-24 14:52, void wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 11:41:17PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >>> >>> Well, I've never used or seen the ifconfig_XXX variable with IP in rc.conf >>> without inet. So if somebody has it without it, it's probably wrong >>> configuration. Similar to what has "changed" recently with IP on bridge >>> members instead of IP on bridge. > I vote for it being required. :) I vote for people reading archives from 10-15 years ago whne we started to require "inet6" and why we did not start to require "inet". /bz PS: that said I wished we had broken things back then too. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?480757q4-5s17-r7qq-95n6-548qpqrr305q>