Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:07:05 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Robert Atkinson <phreaki@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, girishvenkatachalam@gmail.com Subject: Re: VPN Agregation Message-ID: <458989D9.8050101@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <6fb2b4650612190708y74e13e4ak3c767b62d75c0375@mail.gmail.com> References: <fbaddc9a0612141236h8d84a53m9e7a5526bd616d6c@mail.gmail.com> <20061215013509.GA11355@lakshmi.susmita.org> <fbaddc9a0612190253g214b1e66ib8bc693b33273e6@mail.gmail.com> <20061219125800.GA7338@lakshmi.susmita.org> <6fb2b4650612190708y74e13e4ak3c767b62d75c0375@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Atkinson wrote: > I used mpd at one point for a proof of concept to do this, it did work > pretty well with 2 dsl modems, 756k > being bonded into one 1400 link. It did have problems, but I think I got > greedy by using openvpn to push compressed packets through it. Keep the vpn > out of it :) > > It is a good idea, since any single link from the users on one side of the > connection(s) can use all the available bandwidth for one link. > > MLPPP is the way to go for sure, mpd implements it, since from what I > remember reading, most of the MTU bugs are gone and it's just like the old > 'shotgun' modem technology. > > On 12/19/06, Girish Venkatachalam <girishvenkatachalam@gmail.com> wrote: > If you have control of both ends of the tunnels then using mpd, with it's UDP transport can allow you to do a very nice bonded graceful failing tunnel. For bonus points you can use IPSEC to encrypt the UDP packets. > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?458989D9.8050101>