Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:59:20 +0100 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de> To: Eric Bautsch <eric.bautsch@pobox.com> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Bridges on VLAN-tagged interfaces. Message-ID: <B5F26EB1-2779-4AD0-9A4F-8417A94E9367@punkt.de> In-Reply-To: <77aa3369-a6f0-e9c4-e54e-9fab0d41a937@pobox.com> References: <c3bbab99-1612-2f65-644f-a380f8233e11@pobox.com> <716a2edd-96f5-c263-2bd4-38a30808f241@omnilan.de> <050a68a3-7581-4985-e54a-e045259e8cfd@omnilan.de> <aadfded1-b3d6-23cd-a1db-88b86b11f73b@pobox.com> <77aa3369-a6f0-e9c4-e54e-9fab0d41a937@pobox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > Am 18.03.2019 um 22:12 schrieb Eric Bautsch <eric.bautsch@pobox.com>: > I now have a bridge0 on re0.33 which works, great. > I now configure a bridge1 which contains re0 and put an IP on that = bridge, and hey presto, that IP pings, but the IP on bridge0 on VLAN 33 = stops pinging. IMHO you should not be mixing VLAN tagged and untagged traffic on the same interface. A port is a trunk port carrying tagged traffic or an access port carrying untagged traffic only. So you should - again, my opinion - create a VLAN, say 1 on re0 and put re0.1 into bridge1. I know this works from experience. We have some rare performance issues when combining this with VNET but first things first =E2=80=A6 still investigating and = I=E2=80=99ll keep the list informed. Kind regards, Patrick --=20 punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe info@punkt.de http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B5F26EB1-2779-4AD0-9A4F-8417A94E9367>