Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 21:18:57 +0100 From: Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@freebsd.org> Cc: void <void@f-m.fm>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ifconfig_bxe0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv" seems to break bridging Message-ID: <aIKVMTT5-VL-YkXW@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <868qkd9wkf.fsf@ltc.des.dev> References: <aIIuGOc9-hdvUyFU@int21h> <aIIwQq2GQyiAoaTp@freefall.freebsd.org> <756d400d-fa0f-45ea-ba24-235234ee41ff@app.fastmail.com> <868qkd9wkf.fsf@ltc.des.dev>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Dag-Erling Smørgrav: > void <void@f-m.fm> writes: > > ifconfig_bridge0="203.0.113.2/24 addm bxe0 addm tap0" > > missing `inet` here. not required. however, i think it should be. the problem is if we start requiring this it's going to break *everyone's* network configuration and i can't come up with a better reason than "it's neater this way". [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSyjTg96lp3RifySyn1nT63mIK/YAUCaIKVLQAKCRD1nT63mIK/ YM5dAP4xsq1otRO15uASCg2i8+S3BDa9bwMMjBYnZfs8+aQK0wEA5m9jY1goE99y cyaiV9puo7lXd3v6BckWQ/RJNrVCLAg= =ncbz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aIKVMTT5-VL-YkXW>