Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:55:31 -0800 From: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=" <des@des.no> Cc: EchoB <echobinary@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XEN and ZFS Status? Message-ID: <b1fa29170801241255i21de4fa1qb3209c05ee3d1e37@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86ir1j6kbh.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <4797B923.6030400@gmail.com> <86odbbwo02.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4798B651.7000108@samsco.org> <868x2f86pp.fsf@ds4.des.no> <b1fa29170801241115y76983629re25eb9dda0227729@mail.gmail.com> <86ir1j6kbh.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
LOL. On Jan 24, 2008 12:27 PM, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote: > "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> writes: > > I think Scott's irritation may stem from the fact that reality > > contradicts your statements. > > The reality is that there is *zero* support for Xen in CVS. > > What is or is not in Perforce is completely irrelevant when what the OP > asked about was, and I quote, "the production status of Xen and ZFS when > 7.0 is released". > > You and Scott and many others may wish it were otherwise, but it isn't. > Yelling at me and blacklisting me on your mail server won't change it. > > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1fa29170801241255i21de4fa1qb3209c05ee3d1e37>