Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:04:46 +0100 (MET)
From:      Helge Oldach <helge.oldach@atosorigin.com>
To:        e-masson@kisoft-services.com (Eric Masson)
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ipsec tunnels & packet length issues
Message-ID:  <200310290904.KAA09027@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com>
In-Reply-To: <86n0bllhez.fsf@t39bsdems.interne.kisoft-services.com> from Eric Masson at "Oct 28, 2003 12:40: 4 pm"

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

Eric Masson:
>>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> writes:
>
> Michael> You should allow for an IP header with options and the ESP
> Michael> header, which is smaller than 1450. For SKIP I use 1366 as the
> Michael> advertised MTU, and for IPsec usually 1436, unless I need to
> Michael> accomodate ESP and AH, in which case it's smaller.
>
>Ok, that's fine.
>
> Michael> It's a known feature of any sort of IP encapsulation.
>
>I understand.
>
>I'm no kernel hacker at all, I was just thinking about the ability for
>the tunnel endpoint to send back an icmp packet type 3 code 4 when the
>packet is too long to be encapsulated.

Actually this is the case. Or better, it *should* be happening - I don't
know if you see the ICMPs or not. Note that this must be done on the
local tunnel endpoint, not the remote one.

Helge


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310290904.KAA09027>