Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:47:16 -0800 From: Charlie Schluting <charlie@schluting.com> To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: vlans changed? Message-ID: <41EED564.6010104@schluting.com> In-Reply-To: <8eea0408050119132242cd8464@mail.gmail.com> References: <41EECAC0.3000801@schluting.com> <8eea0408050119132242cd8464@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jon Simola wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:01:52 -0800, Charlie Schluting > <charlie@schluting.com> wrote: > > >>Now, in 5.3, the only thing I can get working is to configure the em0 int with >>the IP, and set the trunk to have the native vlan corresponding to that IP. Weird. > > > Sounds like you're not getting the module loaded. By your description > above, you're no longer sending tagged frames over the trunk. Except that I've compiled device vlan into the kernel.. > My rc.conf bits: > > ifconfig_em1="up media auto" > cloned_interfaces="vlan100" > ifconfig_vlan100="inet xx.xx.xx.254 netmask 0xffffff00 vlan 100 vlandev em1" > Yep, that should work, I know :) >>Also, is there a way to stop em(4) from stripping dot1q tags in hardware? I'd >>like to see them with tcpdump. What kind of a performance hit does this involve? > > > # tcpdump -c4 -nvvvei em1 > > Seems to work fine (it's the -e switch that does it). Ah, thanks :) -Charlie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41EED564.6010104>