Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:58:17 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU> Subject: Re: clang (__builtin_ffs) vs /usr/include/string.h Message-ID: <4EF1ADB9.1090802@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <921cedf2-3850-43da-aca2-631beb8e2b58@email.android.com> References: <4EF0CCC6.6060606@lerctr.org> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1112210049170.882@multics.mit.edu> <921cedf2-3850-43da-aca2-631beb8e2b58@email.android.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 21/12/2011 11:31 Larry Rosenman said the following: > Lsof...... > And this seems like a contradiction between the string.h declaration and the built-in one. It more looks like you include machine/cpufunc.h before strings.h and that has an undesired side effect. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EF1ADB9.1090802>