Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 20:39:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Minutes of the Thursday, April 13th core team meeting in Berkeley. Message-ID: <199504220339.UAA21879@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <9504220312.AA06440@cs.weber.edu> from "Terry Lambert" at Apr 21, 95 09:12:56 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > I cheated. By definition, a company that has fallen victim to S^3 > > > will not be successful. If it is, then it hasn't been a victim. > > > > We're clearly inside the 20% zone where Terry is completely and utterly > > off the mark. > > > > IBM "not successful" ???? > > Companies that _allow_ themselves to fall victim to S^3 are "*lucky* if > they survive", not "*successful* if they survive". > > Products that fall victim to S^3 deserve to die. > > Man, I feel like the only person outside of Japan who has read Demming. > Terry IS from another planet ! :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504220339.UAA21879>