Date: Thu, 24 Apr 1997 09:36:30 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Marty Leisner <leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com> Cc: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: flex vs. lex Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970424093142.9762A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <9704232231.AA00939@gnu.sdsp.mc.xerox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 23 Apr 1997, Marty Leisner wrote: > > I was interested in getting AT&T's Software ToolChest which has CSCOPE and > > CSCOPE has the same problems. The Bell Labs web pages now include BSD/OS > > support so I think they had to do something similar. > > > Well, bsd 4.2 probably had the AT&T lex source, so it works. > > They're BSD/OS probably is meaningless to most bsd users (does bsdi repackage > flex?) Why? BSD/OS comes with gcc and flex. > I have a newer version (13.x) then they talked about (12.9). The version on the CD-ROM is 13.x, they must have forgot to update it. The BSD/OS entry on the supported OS's section is new. Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.970424093142.9762A-100000>