Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 22:47:35 -0700 From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= <Jinmei_Tatuya@isc.org> To: Bob Van Zant <bob@veznat.com> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: IPv6 duplicate address detection Message-ID: <m2iqkdv4zs.wl%Jinmei_Tatuya@isc.org> In-Reply-To: <C62776C0.226E4%bob@veznat.com> References: <m2ljp9vla0.wl%Jinmei_Tatuya@isc.org> <C62776C0.226E4%bob@veznat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Wed, 06 May 2009 17:17:52 -0700, Bob Van Zant <bob@veznat.com> wrote: > I guess that changes my question quite a bit. If you randomly fire off an > unsolicited NA right after configuring an interface should that cause a DAD > failure? Actually, in that case you shouldn't send out the NA in the first place because you're in the middle of DAD, trying to confirming the uniqueness of the target address. If you want to send an unsolicited NA for an address on which DAD is performed for any reason, you should wait until DAD is completed. --- JINMEI, Tatuya Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2iqkdv4zs.wl%Jinmei_Tatuya>