Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:42:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201639190.1476@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BD9Qhvc1A4e7Koec5DP6Mo-PTmNW7X9kvC4XVBHzr-zAuBFYg@mail.gmail.com> References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <CAH3a3KWKNF5Bt-8=KgtbMh=rV6GfUO7OaeE6-SutxkcRe8cG3Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191953280.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120619205225.21d6709f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20f61898ce668c96f8882981cf8e24f6@remailer.privacy.at> <4FE1AD27.8000704@gmail.com> <CAH3a3KWHYC%2BpbkdQWF4Pfqv=W0Ldzo8q4T8Ta5wgsryocxNFuA@mail.gmail.com> <1340192731894-5720039.post@n5.nabble.com> <4FE1BD0E.5060300@pukruppa.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201416540.24484@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9Qhvc1A4e7Koec5DP6Mo-PTmNW7X9kvC4XVBHzr-zAuBFYg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> it is only a proof that it was decided to put it as FreeBSD default >> compiler. >> >> > Everything is said, explained and discusse why this decision is made.. So Explanation about "the decision was already made" isn't explanation. but i don't require any explanation. actually i don't require anything. > what do you want? that someone says" Yes you are right clang is shit?". No i don't like words but actions. and i am feared because once such projects like FreeBSD will start to decide about major things this way, it's beginning of end. Politics won over performance and quality. sad. >From my side - end of topic
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201639190.1476>