Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:01:53 +0400 From: Pavel Timofeev <timp87@gmail.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange sendmail behaviour after upgrade to 9.1-BETA2 Message-ID: <CAAoTqfuQqympCGpFtgmMP06FbQ-AW%2BqiybwqTx9FvyQr0%2BgFjg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAAoTqfv_rxCUbYOGDh8GaK3UtYXsGh%2B9rpPxTWxCOVWJsA05ig@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAAoTqfvmsYc=fE9AZyzf9GKBtbazdu%2B3jmD5TjhMqQHDnrtrkw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAoTqfsftjLQMLZpnwtPJYV2gKEn3kumYVycKroi5%2BaEbjEoJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAoTqftbCS_g45e6m9tXhR0wc3Q5-9kWmUDCANX597h8DRQakg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAoTqfuqYkgHg9--wev8Qji7fVvDVB-BVdP1hO=KD4SfuP-RXw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAoTqftW2KJtQnZpk=DV6snXyu21agdaX_8ku0%2B623FDVW71gw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAoTqfv_XAwCUkBh4WFhdNTEe7wZ4_Sbpis3OCacUrwoT-p4NA@mail.gmail.com> <CABXB=RQdycdQKGbOh2tNvzyTpOGSyq6hCAFj=5BAHPMtg90YKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAoTqfu%2BYt5cd%2BOwXqesNcJqatLiZgOssYgLB0CD6ot%2BEp6-KQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAoTqfuBxCpbXON-aa98BgVQz6mZyG-yTkO7630p74eV%2BQvTmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAoTqfsdq%2B31RixZ7BHMt7JyG2W9cXifMp_QSUjEcTAmU3Q1uQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B7WWSeD%2BeWzyriospVX%2Bg1yC6%2BoGD7yH5935yJ6iWPyjUbL-w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAoTqfv_rxCUbYOGDh8GaK3UtYXsGh%2B9rpPxTWxCOVWJsA05ig@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Here is dig output of our domain root@test:/etc/mail # dig xxx.ru IN MX ; <<>> DiG 9.8.4-P2 <<>> xxx.ru IN MX ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39091 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;xxx.ru. IN MX ;; ANSWER SECTION: xxx.ru. 3600 IN MX 10 kalmar.xxx.ru. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: kalmar.xxx.ru. 3600 IN A 192.168.31.190 ;; Query time: 1 msec ;; SERVER: 192.168.2.12#53(192.168.2.12) ;; WHEN: Thu Aug 1 15:00:23 2013 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 63 2013/8/1 Pavel Timofeev <timp87@gmail.com>: > I'm sorry( > So resolver is MS server. > > But does it matter when it works good with 9.1 and doesn't work with 9.2? > > What I have to do for investigation? > > > 2013/8/1 Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com>: >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Pavel Timofeev <timp87@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Ok, I understand. Thanks a lot for excelent explanation. Maybe >>> sendmail ignores additional section? >>> >>> I use _default_ fresh system, so resolver is _default_ bind. >>> For investigation I've just installed fresh 9.1-RELEASE amd64, email >>> delivery works and picture looks different than on 9.2: >>> >> >> The default resolver is not BIND because it's not enabled by default. >> The nameservers listed in /etc/resolv.conf are used for resolving >> addresses in default setup (assuming they are filled properly by DHCP >> client or manually by user). >> >> -Kimmo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAAoTqfuQqympCGpFtgmMP06FbQ-AW%2BqiybwqTx9FvyQr0%2BgFjg>