Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:15:11 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD needs Git to ensure repo integrity [was: 2012 incident] Message-ID: <50AA30DF.6080406@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CADLo838yH5rhBqFkQfD8oAFhUG61dM_Hhf=APbzHUi_=B7N08w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAD2Ti29UoFcHendR8CcdQ4FPNW1HH0O47B1i3JW00Lke2m2POg@mail.gmail.com> <20121117221143.41c29ba2@nonamehost> <op.wnxq9eo0g7njmm@michael-think> <CADLo838oG26KmfHJ%2BtLh82GoJzzRtfqy69%2BNny1_DC8F8X4POQ@mail.gmail.com> <50a8eb34.5pMwq6kSsi47QgKI%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20121118073128.GG73505@kib.kiev.ua> <CAJ-Vmom6%2BS3HDuOF6woWyvST1JVPjwV6GUs2RJGtfD_z_YVNDA@mail.gmail.com> <50A8BD0F.7030609@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-VmonTBUpCNXZuWoWbn2XRVMU2bM2uqjZBhz9%2Buv4ZU6LW6w@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo838LVR8aguPBQ_ck3BcOLV2PTSe0gnoVovVUEQA-3j_T_Q@mail.gmail.com> <50AA2E88.1040005@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo838yH5rhBqFkQfD8oAFhUG61dM_Hhf=APbzHUi_=B7N08w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 19/11/2012 15:08 Chris Rees said the following: > > On 19 Nov 2012 13:05, "Andriy Gapon" <avg@freebsd.org <mailto:avg@freebsd.org>> > wrote: >> >> on 18/11/2012 16:17 Chris Rees said the following: >> > On 18 November 2012 14:04, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org > <mailto:adrian@freebsd.org>> wrote: >> >> On 18 November 2012 02:48, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org > <mailto:avg@freebsd.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> What you describe is not a workflow issue, but a local development >> >>> environment(s) setup issue. >> >> >> >> Which is a workflow issue. >> >> >> >> I mean, we could bang heads on semantics for hours on end, or we can >> >> realise that git isn't a magic bullet for FreeBSD development. >> > >> > Also... did I mention git is GPL? >> >> Yes, you did, twice now. >> I do not see any relevance of Git license to FreeBSD's choice of SCM solution. >> But, of course, I am not: >> a) a zealot >> b) proposing Git (or Subversion, or Mercurial) to be bundled with a base system > > I'm disappointed that you choose to call me a zealot- this is a valid concern, > especially since we're trying to move away from GPL stuff. Whether it's in base > or not, you'd still be forcing me to install it for development. Why are people > so dismissive of this point? a. I haven't called you a zealot b. You now _sound_ like a zealot if even just installing GPL-licensed software on your local/private machine sounds like a problem to you -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50AA30DF.6080406>