Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 04:44:08 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Seth <seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Q] How stable is FreeBSD 3.X ? Message-ID: <374AFD88.9E6D2C6E@newsguy.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9905250926210.21875-100000@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Seth wrote: > > Actually, I agree with everything you've said up until this point. My > question of last week dealt specifically with this topic, and has remained > unanswered. It was a repeat of a similar question I asked approx. 2 > months ago, again with no responses. I've looked for material but haven't > found anything that deals specifically with interpreting debugger output. The handbook has a kernel debug session. If you get a panic, use that information. You need not actually interpret the output. That really requires lots of expertise, and knowledge of the code. We, developers, often post those outputs when we can't identify the bug ourselves, in the hope that other developers can. What we *do* need is that information. From there, someone might be able to ask for more specific information (which can be easily done if you have the dump saved). (Of course, I'm supposing you have read the often referred http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/kerneldebug.html page) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?374AFD88.9E6D2C6E>