Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 15:01:17 -0500 From: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> To: scanner@jurai.net Cc: isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Message-ID: <5.0.0.25.0.20010324144957.03d1c300@mail.etinc.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103241418270.11717-100000@sasami.jurai.net> References: <5.0.0.25.0.20010324142619.03a8a690@mail.etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 02:20 PM 03/24/2001, scanner@jurai.net wrote: >On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Dennis wrote: > > > You are dealing with a company with more lawyers than FreeBSD has > > users. it will take them the life of the product to decide what is > > proprietary and what is not. > > Whining hackers wont get Intel to change their policy. > > I would hardly consider my discussions as whining. So I can count >you on board for removing fxp from CVS then dennis? :-) You're obviously >in agreement Intel is not going to change its way's. You dont need to sign an NDA to do a driver. You just need to work a little harder. Blaming Intel because the driver sucks is a cop-out. They provide enough info to get the job done. db To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.0.0.25.0.20010324144957.03d1c300>