Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:33:35 -0500 (CDT) From: Emily Ratliff <ratliff@austin.ibm.com> To: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Jason DiCioccio <jdicioccio@epylon.com>, "'Artur Meski'" <glash@freebsd.net.pl>, <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>, <robert@watson.org> Subject: Re: Exec logging, FreeBSD Kernel Module. Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0107171429310.16870-100000@spiff.austin.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010717135000.44228B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Andrew R. Reiter wrote: > Anyone have any thoughts on 1) what happened at hte BoF and 2) future of > kernel hook standards in fbsd? Assuming you are talking about the Kernel Security Extensions BoF see http://lwn.net/2001/0704/security.php3 for a LWN write-up about it. Linked off of that page is my summary of the BoF which was posted to the (Linux) Loadable Security Module mailing list linked off of that page. After the initial presentations, the discussion focused around the LSM effort. The homepage for LSM is http://lsm.immunix.org/ Emily Emily Ratliff IBM Linux Technology Center, Security To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0107171429310.16870-100000>