Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:25:13 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Charles Sprickman <spork@bway.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1 quota issues Message-ID: <20060710052513.GF37822@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSX.4.61.0607100039100.3261@white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com> References: <Pine.OSX.4.61.0607072227510.3261@white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com> <20060708085132.GD98476@over-yonder.net> <Pine.OSX.4.61.0607100039100.3261@white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--EcSFpNr6Vcxykj4g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 12:41:07AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote: > On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: >=20 > >On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:56:47PM -0400 I heard the voice of > >Charles Sprickman, and lo! it spake thus: > >> > >>Trying again, it reported the same inconsistencies then sat there > >>for more than an hour taking up all the available CPU on the box > >>until I killed it. The mtime on quota.user had not changed during > >>the run. > > > >FWIW, I saw this on a box I setup running a late November -CURRENT > >last year; I could never get the quotas setup and running right > >because the check always just looped itself up. The partition they're > >on has about 3 gig used out of ~45, with maybe a dozen users. I never > >spent much time on it, since it's just a personal box, and the quotas > >are mostly just to provide a handy measure of who's using what (no > >limits set). I just gave it up and decided to worry about it later. >=20 > What should I do here? It's consistently failing. What information=20 > should I gather to forumulate a PR that won't burden the assignee with=20 > lots of troubleshooting mess? The machine is not in production, but ther= e=20 > is user data on it. I could allow a trusted developer access to it, or= =20 > even create another jail to illustrate the problem. It is not clear from your report whether you run fsck on the problem partition. I think (and my view is backed by "unexpected inconsistencies" message) that this is the must. --EcSFpNr6Vcxykj4g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEseS3C3+MBN1Mb4gRAs2sAJ4yJ77URWpC3V1CzMhV0QWN50hw2ACffWR6 3zECtBVI3lc7wXQWM0+5/m0= =Q9MP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EcSFpNr6Vcxykj4g--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060710052513.GF37822>