Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 13:27:41 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> Cc: Anthony Hill <ahill@interconnect.com.au>, Joe Ziskovsky <prefect@prefect.unomaha.edu>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compile problems with 2.1 Message-ID: <199511292027.NAA21040@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951129145926.7811A-100000@espresso.eng.umd.edu> References: <Pine.BSI.3.91.951129172130.12864C-100000@tulpi.interconnect.com.au> <Pine.SUN.3.91.951129145926.7811A-100000@espresso.eng.umd.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Chuck Robey writes: > On Wed, 29 Nov 1995, Anthony Hill wrote: > > > > > > > > device, and it's NOT an optional device, put it back in. > > > > I am doing this all the time - It would be great if someone popped a few > > extra comments in LINT detailing which devices were optional, and which > > were not. (Trial and error can get a bit tedious) > > > > LINT (/usr/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT) does in fact do this, as the following > excerpt shows: > > # > # Mandatory ISA devices: isa, sc or vt, npx > # I *just* added more comments above the npx device so that people wouldn't miss it anymore. I even saw the above comment, but it is obvious that other people haven't noticed it in the past given the # of support requests lately on _hw_float. Natehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511292027.NAA21040>